To accountants, those patient-centered results equate to cost savings and increased turnover. Previously, 2directions presented an analysis of how bed turnover is one of the primary drivers of hospital efficiency. Better turnover increases capacity and widens bottlenecks that otherwise limit patient flow. It’s much easier to justify those benefits through a low cost, low risk quality improvement project, than through heavy capital expenditure and disruptive construction of new beds. We estimate her work releases $1.7 million from the annual operating budget and avoids $3 million of capital expenditures.
Her work provides meaningful patient stories and a compelling business case. But even as Bela Patel’s Medical Intensive Care Unit has gone without a VAP for five years, in most hospitals, VAPs remain a monthly occurrence. This observation led 2directions to ask what barriers prevent rapid adoption of such tremendous accomplishment to other healthcare institutions. Several of us at 2directions have experience outside healthcare. Software, industrial manufacturing, and retail provide reference of successful scale: the explosive growth of social networks, the economics of precision in mass production, and fashion trends. The answer to why scale is not possible in quality improvement is the same reason my former employer, IBM Consulting, has been tremendously successful, even in economic downturn -- QI is a highly customized service. Solutions aren’t simply adopted, they must be adapted. Even if the solution has proven successful elsewhere, adaptation is required, and it is an expensive process that calls upon local heroes to successfully shift the organization to the new clinical approach.
It became our conviction that QI scale is hindered by two cultures. The clinical culture is hesitant to change processes. Physicians are apt to believe in a system in which hard work, by competent people, delivers the best patient outcomes. We need a change agent that will risk reputation and expend great efforts to demonstrate that even better patient outcomes are possible through QI. The financial culture of the hospital is hesitant to invest in projects which disrupt the current model. Reluctance can be overcome by a salesperson who understands the hospital’s financial drivers, and uses those drivers to connect their offering to better business outcomes. We need a similarly equipped salesperson for QI.
Understanding these barriers to scale, and the capabilities needed to surmount them, we considered the equipment which would enable physicians to overcome them. We aim to refine our blueprint and begin to fabricate these tools over the next 8 months. However, ours is not a “if we build it, they will come” type solution. Only participation by QI Physician Leaders will substantiate our vision. Therefore our first step was to garner support for our concept from the American Medical Association. We drafted a resolution which describes the problem we identified and our approach to a solution, and presented it to the AMA medical student section (MSS) to ask for promotional support. The MSS formally adopted our resolution at their national meeting in New Orleans one week ago. It’s a milestone we are excited to share. The next step will be for physicians to debate this resolution on the floor of the House of Delegates, at the AMA meeting in Chicago this summer. Passage would be a strong catalyst to improve collaboration between QI leaders.
